Table of Contents

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state

Renowned Greek philosopher Plato outlined his ideal state in his ground-breaking work The Republic. Plato imagines a strict system of governance in this utopian society, with guardians, workers, and philosopher-kings serving distinct roles to maintain peace and justice. But one remarkable aspect of Plato’s perfect society is the Republic’s exclusion of artists, particularly poets.

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state-Many questions about the function of art in society, the nature of imitation, and the possible impact of artistic expressions on the state’s citizens are brought up by this exclusion.

Plato’s Aesthetics and the Power of Imitation:

In order to understand Plato’s distaste for artists, one must study his aesthetics and his theories regarding the persuasiveness of imitation. In “The Republic,” Plato makes the case that the Forms, or timeless, unchanging ideals that exist outside of the physical world, are what the material world is only an imitation of. Plato asserts that imitation—and art in general—represents a false and secondary reality. He argues that artists are warping the truth and discouraging people from seeking out deeper knowledge by imitating how the outside world appears.

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state-In Book X of “The Republic,” Plato distinguishes between three types of imitations: those made by God (the Forms), those made by craftsmen (physical objects), and those made by artists (poets and painters). He criticizes the last category, asserting that poets and artists create imitations of imitations, thus moving further away from the truth. Plato’s fear is that these imitations have the potential to mislead individuals, clouding their understanding of reality and virtue.

The Influence of Art on Morality:

Central to Plato’s exclusion of artists is his concern about the moral influence of art on the citizens of the ideal state. Plato is wary of the emotional and irrational impact that artistic representations can have on individuals. In “The Republic,” he argues that poetry and other forms of art often appeal to the irrational and emotional aspects of human nature, bypassing reason and critical thinking. Plato, being a proponent of reason as the guiding principle for a just society, fears that art might evoke undesirable emotions, leading to a disruption of the citizens’ moral equilibrium.

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state-Plato’s critique extends to the portrayal of immoral characters and actions in art. He contends that poets, in their pursuit of dramatic and captivating narratives, may present characters engaging in unethical behavior without adequately condemning or critiquing such actions. This, according to Plato, can contribute to the moral degradation of the citizens by normalizing or glorifying immoral conduct.

Censorship and Control of Ideas:

Plato’s propensity for idea control and censorship is another important factor contributing to his distaste for artists in their ideal state. Plato worries that the established order and ideals of the Republic may be questioned or undermined by artists via their works. In “The Republic,” Socrates makes the case that tales that depict the gods negatively or as immoral actors should be banned. Plato believed that the state should have the power to mold and control the stories that its citizens are exposed to, which is why he placed such emphasis on controlling narratives.

Also Read-

Plato’s approach to censorship aligns with his broader goal of maintaining social harmony and preventing any disruptive influences on the citizens’ minds. He fears that unregulated artistic expressions may introduce dissenting ideas or alternative perspectives that could lead to a divergence from the prescribed societal norms.

The Allegory of the Cave and the Illusory Nature of Art:

In Book VII of “The Republic,” Plato presents the Allegory of the Cave, which clarifies his mistrust of art even more. In this allegory, Plato compares the state of humanity to that of prisoners shackled and imprisoned inside a pitch-black cave, able to see only the shadows cast by objects behind them. The convicts confuse the shadows for reality, which symbolizes the false world of appearances. According to Plato, artists are similar to those who cast shadows; they maintain a misleading reality that diverts people from the search for knowledge and the truth.

From Plato’s perspective, art, like the shadows in the cave, is a deceptive representation that veils the true nature of reality. The artist’s ability to evoke emotions and create a semblance of reality contributes to the perpetuation of the illusory world, diverting individuals from the quest for the higher truths embodied in the Forms.

Plato’s Alternative: The Importance of Education and Philosophy:

In place of art, Plato advocates for an educational system that promotes philosophy and reason as the guiding principles of the ideal state. He proposes that guardians and rulers should be well-versed in the pursuit of knowledge and possess a deep understanding of the Forms. For Plato, true knowledge is derived through dialectical reasoning and the contemplation of the eternal and unchanging Forms, rather than through the deceptive imitations presented by artists.

Plato’s exclusion of artists is not a rejection of creativity or expression but rather a redirection of these impulses towards the pursuit of knowledge and virtue. He envisions a society where individuals are guided by reason and wisdom rather than the transient and emotional appeals of art.

Implications and Critiques:

While Plato’s exclusion of artists from the ideal state is grounded in his philosophical framework, it has sparked significant debates and critiques over the centuries. Critics argue that Plato’s distrust of art overlooks its potential for fostering empathy, encouraging critical thinking, and challenging societal norms. Additionally, the idea of state-controlled censorship raises concerns about individual freedoms and the stifling of creativity.

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state-Furthermore, Plato’s emphasis on a rigid hierarchy led by philosopher-kings has been criticized for its potential to create an authoritarian and elitist system. The exclusion of artists may be seen as part of a broader pattern of limiting diverse voices and perspectives within the state, potentially hindering social progress and cultural evolution.

Conclusion

Plato’s decision to exclude artists from his ideal state in “The Republic” is deeply rooted in his philosophical convictions regarding the nature of reality, the power of imitation, and the potential influence of art on individuals and society. Plato’s skepticism toward art arises from his belief that artistic creations, being imitations of the material world, lead individuals away from the pursuit of higher truths and virtues embodied in the Forms. The moral implications, emotional impact, and the potential for art to challenge the established order contribute to Plato’s vision of a society where artistic expression is carefully regulated.

Plato proposes an alternative educational system that prioritizes philosophy and reason, aiming to cultivate individuals who are guided by the pursuit of knowledge and virtue rather than the transient and emotional appeals of art. While this vision aligns with Plato’s overarching goal of creating a just and harmonious society, it has been met with critiques regarding the stifling of creativity, the potential for authoritarianism, and the restriction of diverse voices.

The tension between Plato’s vision of an ideal state and the complexities of artistic expression continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about the role of art in society, individual freedoms, and the balance between order and creative freedom. As societies grapple with these questions, the legacy of Plato’s exclusionary stance invites reflection on the intricate relationship between art, governance, and the human experience.

FAQ:

Why does Plato exclude artists from his ideal state?

Plato excludes artists, particularly poets, from his ideal state due to his philosophical beliefs about the deceptive nature of art. He argues that art, as an imitation of the material world, distracts individuals from the pursuit of higher truths and virtues embodied in the eternal Forms. Plato is also concerned about the potential moral influence, emotional impact, and the ability of art to challenge established norms within the society.

What is Plato’s view on the power of imitation in art?

Plato contends that the power of imitation in art is deceptive and leads individuals further away from the truth. He distinguishes between imitations made by God (the Forms), craftsmen (physical objects), and artists (poets and painters). Plato is critical of artists who create imitations of imitations, considering them to be distorting reality and potentially misleading individuals by appealing to their emotions rather than reason.

How does Plato’s Allegory of the Cave relate to his views on art?

The Allegory of the Cave illustrates Plato’s perspective on the illusory nature of the material world and its connection to his views on art. In the allegory, prisoners mistake shadows on a cave wall for reality, much like how Plato sees art as creating deceptive imitations that distract individuals from the pursuit of higher truths. The artist, like those who create shadows in the cave, contributes to the perpetuation of the illusory world.

What alternative does Plato propose to art in his ideal state?

Plato advocates for an educational system that prioritizes philosophy and reason over art. He proposes that guardians and rulers should be well-versed in the pursuit of knowledge and possess a deep understanding of the eternal Forms. Plato envisions a society where individuals are guided by reason and wisdom, redirecting creative impulses toward the pursuit of truth and virtue rather than the transient and emotional appeals of art.

What criticisms have been raised against Plato’s exclusion of artists?

Critics argue that Plato’s exclusion of artists overlooks the potential for art to foster empathy, encourage critical thinking, and challenge societal norms. The emphasis on state-controlled censorship raises concerns about individual freedoms and the stifling of creativity. Furthermore, Plato’s hierarchical system has been criticized for its potential to create an authoritarian and elitist society, limiting diverse voices and hindering social progress.

How does the tension between Plato’s vision and artistic freedom persist in contemporary discussions?

The tension between Plato’s vision of an ideal state and the complexities of artistic expression continues to be relevant in contemporary discussions. Societies grapple with questions about the role of art, the autonomy of individual expression, and the balance between order and creative freedom. The legacy of Plato’s exclusionary stance invites ongoing reflection on the intricate relationship between art, governance, and the diverse expressions of the human experience.